We've kind of talked about this in class, so I wanted to touch up on the subject. Ouroboros is the word for "a snake biting its own tail". It's Greek for "tail-eater". The Greeks really liked the idea of Eternal Recurrence. Eternal Recurrence is like the idea of "you never walk through the same river twice," everything goes in cycles. Ouroboros symbolizes this ideology. Plato believed that the first living thing in the universe was a self-eating immortal, perfectly constructed. However, it was not Plato who invented this concept.
The Ouroboros has appeared in many cultures. Artifacts containing a coiled serpent were found
Later, alchemists began to use the Ouroboros. However, for them it symbolized the ultimate goal of all alchemists; the Philosopher's Stone. The Philosopher's Stone is a fabled material that is said to be able to turn basic metals into gold and also create the Elixir of Life. The Elixir, of course, would provide immortality. Therefore, Ouroboros, an infinite cycle, is appropriate as a symbol for immortality. Once the alchemists died off, and the Elixir of Life was no longer being searched for, Ouroboros decreased in popularity, only showing up occasionally on Masonic structures and such.
However, during the late 19th Century, German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche revitalized the idea of eternal recurrence, and wrote many books which contained at least some mention of the idea. To Nietzsche, who was a staunch atheist, eternal recurrence was not controlled by an entity. Rather, he believed that time was cyclical, and that the world was somewhat like a sieve in that there would be people who were workers, people who were leaders, and people who were artists, etc. And he believed that eternal recurrence had more to do with what people would become, in that there will always be artists and patrons to support the artists. This gave the world balance to Nietzsche.
Nietzsche lived around the same time as the psychologist Sigmund Freud, and, if not directly, Nietzsche indirectly influenced the psychologist. After Freud came Jung, who was very interested in Nietzsche's ideas. Jung also became interested in the symbol of ouroboros. He wrote seminars interpreting Nietzsche's eternal recurrence as well as the ouroboros. To Jung, the ouroboros meant not just infinity, but also unity. The head and tail meet; opposites attract, and from the clashing of opposites comes One.
Since then, ouroboros have been used in many forms of media. For instance, many musicians have used it as names for songs/albums, and even Neil Peart, the drummer of the band Rush, uses the ouroboros symbol on his drum kit. It has been used in plenty of books, such as Breakfast of Champions by Kurt Vonnegut, and has even appeared in video games.
WALL OF TEXT OVER. Just some food for thought. I spent a long time on this, I better get comments.
Also, here are a few pictures of ouroboros.
Some Images involving ouroboros:
Neil Peart's drum set: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Neil_Peart3.jpg
Quetzalcoatl as ouroboros: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7f/Quetzalcoatl_Ouroboros.png
An ouroboros tattoo featured on Dana Scully in an episode of X-Files: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c9/Scullyouroboros.jpg
Chinese Ouroboros from Chou Dynasty, around 1200 B.C.: http://www.crystalinks.com/ouroboroschina.jpg
Alembic, Inc., a guitar and bass company, known for close relationships with bands such as The Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane, Crosby Stills Nash & Young, etc. The ouroboros is a the circle, it may be hard to tell: http://www.zianet.com/ufo_lowrider/pics/alembic.gif
10 comments:
Hey Shiloh, good job! I really liked it and thought it was very thought provoking. Gee, I wish I could write posts no one will read.
But anyway, while writing this, I was wondering why the Aztecs had used ouroboros and wondered if China had introduced them to it, since China landed in America around 1410. However, upon research, I found out that the Chinese landed in Chile, nowhere near the Aztecs. I guess it's just one of those things multiple cultures have, like a story of an advanced civilization being consumed by the sea. And sorry about the delete, there was a typo that I wanted to fix. The trash can isn't an edit button.
Hey Shiloh,
When reading information about ancient history, you need to be very careful about what you believe, because there is a lot of misinformation out there. There is no archaeological evidence of the Chinese ever getting to the New World. Your source may be confusing some ideas about Japanese influence on South America (which has never been proved and is an idea with racist roots (ie. "The Japanese are far more advanced than "these" people. "These" people have a type of pottery glaze close to that used in Japan at one point, therefore the Japanese must have brought that technology to "them."). These theories only involve "evidence" from one type of pottery glaze, and argue that two areas of the world could not have developed this glaze on their own, but I would direct you to the radio and its invention as a refutation of that argument.
The Aztecs did use this image, but the artifacts that we do have from the Aztec world shows that they used it infrequently.
"I guess it's just one of those things multiple cultures have, like a story of an advanced civilization being consumed by the sea. " -- Yup. Jung would say it is part of our collective unconscious.
Shiloh, that was all very interesting. I'd like to have a conversation with you about it sometime. do you have a cell number?
I really liked how easy to read Oedipus was. Very comprehensible.
POSTED BY OLIVIAKATE AT 8:56 AM 0 COMMENTS
Actually, there is archaeological evidence that China did have some contact with South America in 1421. In fact, Chinese DNA has even been found in the Maori of New Zealand. Also, the Navajo speak Chinese. You can read more about it here: http://www.1421.tv/extract.htm
Shiloh,
I'm not going to argue with you about the veracity of some wack-job's pseudo research, although I would love to talk to you about archaeology some time. My degree in Native American Studies from Colgate and my years of PhD work in Archaeology at Tulane give me a little knowledge on the subject. You might want to check out what reliable historians and archaeologists think about Gavin Mendez's ideas: Journal of World Archaeology (published by Cambridge UP) article refuting the 1421 idea
Menzies, sorry.
While the link you cited was not the whole paper, I read some criticisms of the book. I didn't check my sources, and I hadn't even read the book, I had just read articles on it. So, I stand corrected. It's good, though, since at least now I know that it's disputable and won't make the same mistake in the future. Skepticism seems to be a necessity today, and it's a shame I must even carry it with me in my education.
Well, it's good to learn how to be a savvy consumer of knowledge. The better your sources are, the better your own knowledge base will be. It's my job to help you learn how to differentiate between legitimate sources and pseudo-academics.
Post a Comment